Week 5 PLANNING PRESENTATIONS - Critical Thinking

Group One that presented

Aerial Ropeway in a World Heritage Environment 

McMahon, Bethany Louise

Park, Maria Eun Ji

Parto, Daisy Danica

Hoda, Iqra Faria

Nguyen, Yen Nhien

Portokalli, Matthew Louis

Thoughts of Presentation/ General Feedback from Markers

The editing skills in the video presented was fantastic. I think finishing their presentation of with that video was a great way to end their presentation. The information they delivered was good, They went into depth with most things, and by depth i mean they explained each thing to a good understanding for the audience to pick up.

Group Two that presented

The Bus Stop of the Future. 

Lo, Jason How Ying

Alagah, George

Gan, Ruo Qi

Naumovski, Michael

Tang, Kangyi

Thoughts of Presentation/ General Feedback from Markers

I think the planning process for this presentation was very critical and solid with their information. They used fixed budget of spending money and resources needed to complete a project which shows great depth of detail for planning something. The costing things they used were for their own project so in doing so, allowed the audience to get a better understanding of the topic. One thing i have negative is i thought the video was boring. There was no eye catching parts that thought me anything it was just talking into to camera with information they had used almost the same as their presentation.

Understanding of planning and relation to presentations

My understanding of planning is establishing an organized set of tasks to reach certain goals.

I believe that it is critical to apply planning to any tasks so you have a sense of direction, however taking into consideration of delays for some tasks may alter the planning strategy  In this case planning alterations will take place. Planning is basically a process that occurs throughout the entire development period with any tasks. Both Presentations presented a set of organized outline of tasks which they have evenly spread out between the group allowing them to reach goals at deadlines, however one group did not take into consideration of delays and having their final projects by final dates instead of leaving 1-2 weeks for example on revision weeks or in worst case, weeks to work on things that have been delayed.