Group One that presented
The Last Supremist Sculpture
Alyssa Raymundo & Vedran Kuljic
Thoughts of Presentation/ General Feedback from Markers
This group touched on most elements of IP. I think two thinks could have improved with their presentation. One is the depth of information rather than just mentioning most aspects but not looking into the aspect. It is important to not only state the things they are talking about but explanations on each part would have been great to see. They also didn't really show how IP can relate or be applied to their project. Being able to do so, does not only show us they understand it well but also helps us put certain things they spoke about into perspective.
Group Two that presented
The Creation of Gothic Architecture
Alan Kim, Dorothy Lam, Maki Nagaya, David Le, Ricky Zhao & Stefan Koteski
Thoughts of Presentation/ General Feedback from Markers
This group had a great video incorperationg a scenario where an idea they have may be stolen and what options they have to prevent it. This was great as i immediately understood aspects of what they are talking about. Also the group displayed relevant information on how IP can relate t their project also and what factors of IP are optional. Most other information was relatively good.
Initially IP for me was just how to protect something. Being as that is there is much more that just a protection on something as many factors may come into play to get full protection from an idea etc.
Using collaborative work, IP is crucial factor in ensuring any work you do is yours and not allowing someone to come and claim property that is not theirs. Known factor is not only saying its your work but being able to prove it with research and history logging of your progression to work you have accomplished.
No comments:
Post a Comment